Directrices del autor

Types of Accepted Articles

REDA accepts the following types of articles:

•         Original research articles
•         Review articles
•         Research notes

Original Research Articles (6,000 to 8,000 words)

These correspond to unpublished scientific studies presenting results derived from empirical or experimental research. These works must be structured following the IMRaD scheme (Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, and Discussion) and must provide solid evidence on topics such as agricultural extension, technology adoption, sustainability of productive systems, and agricultural development.

Structure

•        Title (required in Spanish and English)
•        Abstract (200–250 words, required in Spanish and English): Purpose, Methodology, Main Results, Implications for extension, Contribution of the study.
•         Keywords in Spanish and English (4–6)
•         Introduction: Problem context, Relevance to extension, Objectives or hypotheses
•         Methodology: Research design, Study area, Participants or units of analysis, Data collection techniques, Statistical or qualitative analysis
•         Results
•         Discussion
•         Conclusions
•         Acknowledgments (optional)
•         Funding
•         Declaration of conflicts of interest
•         References

Abstract Structure

•         Purpose: 1–2 sentences. The study's purpose, framed in terms of theoretical contribution.
•         Design/Methodology: 2–3 sentences. Describe the study design (mixed/qualitative/quantitative), sample type (n= producers), data collection tools (surveys, interviews, observation), and analytical framework.
•         Findings/Results: 2–3 sentences. Main results, with concrete data where possible.
•         Conclusions: 2–3 sentences. Theoretical implications and practical takeaways for other contexts.

Writing Considerations

•         Clearly explain how the results contribute to extension practice.
•         Adequately describe the territorial context of the study.
•         Include a critical analysis of the study's limitations.

Review Articles (6,000 to 9,000 words)

These include systematic, narrative, or meta-analysis reviews that synthesize the state of the art on a specific topic. They must present a critical analysis of the scientific literature, identify knowledge gaps, and propose research agendas in areas related to extension, innovation, and agricultural development.

May be:

•         Narrative review
•         Systematic review
•         Meta-analysis

Structure

•         Title (Spanish and English)
•         Abstract (max. 250 words, Spanish and English)
•         Introduction
•         Methodology
•         Results or thematic synthesis
•         Discussion
•         Conclusions
•         References

Research Notes (3,000 to 4,000 words)

These are brief contributions describing innovative methodologies, tools, technologies, or procedures applicable to the agricultural sector. These notes must highlight their practical utility, reproducibility, and adoption potential in productive contexts.

May include:

•         Pilot evaluations
•         Proof of concept
•         Study replications

Structure

•         Introduction
•         Methodology
•         Results
•         Discussion
•         References

Citation Style

All information, data, knowledge, or opinions that are not the original work of the lead author or co-authors must be properly cited and referenced according to the guidelines of the American Psychological Association (APA 7th edition).

•         Include DOI when available
•         Ensure correspondence between in-text citations and the reference list

Figures and Tables

•         Must be cited in the text.
•         Must include a title and source.
•         Must be understandable independently of the text.

Language

Manuscripts may be submitted in Spanish. Titles, abstracts, and keywords must be submitted in both Spanish and English. Optionally, an abstract and keywords in an indigenous language related to the study's context may also be provided. In all cases, clear, precise, and technical language appropriate to the academic level of the journal is expected. Authors are responsible for ensuring the linguistic quality of the text; specialized review is recommended when the language of writing is not the author's native language.

Manuscript Structure

The manuscript must be organized following a logical structure that facilitates understanding of the scientific content. The title must be concise, informative, and specific, avoiding unnecessary abbreviations or ambiguous expressions, and incorporating the main study variables. The abstract must be between 150 and 250 words and synthetically present the objective, methodology, main results, and most relevant conclusions, without including citations or undefined abbreviations. Keywords must be four to six representative terms of the article content, preferably not repeating terms from the title and using controlled vocabularies when possible.

Article Body

The article body constitutes the core of the scientific manuscript and must be structured in a logical, coherent, and rigorous manner, enabling the reader to understand the problem addressed, how it was investigated, the findings obtained, and their scientific or applied relevance.

Introduction

The introduction must place the reader in the study context, progressively presenting the addressed problem and its scientific, technical, or social relevance. It must include a critical synthesis of the most important background, highlighting existing advances and current knowledge limitations. The introduction must not limit itself to an enumeration of previous studies, but establish a coherent narrative leading to the identification of a knowledge gap or a specific research need. The study's objective or hypothesis must be clearly defined, directly linked to the described problem. Excessively lengthy reviews should be avoided, maintaining a precise focus that justifies the relevance of the work.

Methodology

This section must clearly and systematically describe how the research was conducted, so that it can be replicated. The study location must be specified, including relevant characteristics such as climatic, edaphic, environmental, social, and cultural conditions, as appropriate. The methodological design must be detailed, indicating the type of study, sample size, and experimental units, if applicable. Evaluated variables must be clearly defined, including measurement methods and instruments used. The statistical analysis must be precisely presented, indicating the models used, applied tests, significance level, and software employed. International System units must be used, maintaining terminological consistency throughout the section.

Results

The results section must present the study's findings clearly, orderly, and objectively, without extensive interpretations. Results must be organized following a logical sequence that responds to the study's objective or hypotheses. The use of tables and figures is recommended to facilitate understanding, provided they add value and do not duplicate what is described in the text. Each presented result must be supported by verifiable data, including, where applicable, variability and statistical significance indicators. The text must highlight the most relevant findings, avoiding redundant descriptions of information contained in graphic elements.

Discussion

The discussion's purpose is to interpret the results obtained and place them in the context of existing scientific knowledge. The author must analyze the significance of the findings, explain the possible causes of the observed results, and contrast them with previous studies, highlighting coincidences, discrepancies, and novel contributions. The discussion must not limit itself to repeating results, but delve deeper into their interpretation, considering both theoretical and practical implications. Study limitations and future lines of research may also be addressed. The argumentation must be solid, evidence-based, and coherently articulated with the objectives set forth in the introduction.

Conclusions

Conclusions must clearly and precisely synthesize the main findings of the study in relation to the stated objective. They must be written directly, avoiding textual repetition of results or inclusion of new information not previously presented. It is essential that conclusions be fully supported by the obtained data and reflect the study's contribution to existing knowledge or its practical application. Where applicable, recommendations derived from the results may be included, provided they are duly substantiated. Excessive generalizations or claims that exceed the scope of the study must be avoided.

Tables and Figures

Tables and figures must be presented clearly and in order, numbered consecutively according to their appearance in the text. Each must include a descriptive title that allows for independent understanding. Images must have adequate resolution for reproduction, with a minimum of 300 dpi recommended. Redundancy between tables and figures, as well as unnecessary repetition of information already described in the text, must be avoided.

Bibliographic References

References must conform to APA 7th edition style. Only references that have been cited in the text should be included, prioritizing relevant and current scientific literature. Excessive use of non-peer-reviewed or difficult-to-access sources should be avoided, ensuring correspondence between in-text citations and the reference list.

Writing Style

The manuscript must be written using technical, formal, and precise language, preferably in the third person and in an impersonal voice. Coherence and cohesion between paragraphs must be maintained, using appropriate logical connectors that facilitate text comprehension. Ambiguities, redundancies, subjective judgments, and colloquial expressions must be avoided, ensuring a clear and academic style.

Ethical Considerations

Authors must guarantee that the manuscript is original, unpublished, and not simultaneously submitted to another journal. They must also declare any potential conflict of interest and, where applicable, indicate compliance with ethical standards related to experimentation, biosafety, or the use of living organisms. All authors (lead author and co-authors) are responsible for the accuracy of the data presented, opinions expressed, and the consistency of cited information with original sources. Scientific integrity and transparency are fundamental principles in the publication process. The editorial committee reserves the right to reject articles in which any ethical non-compliance or undeclared conflict of interest is detected.

Manuscript Format

The manuscript must be submitted in Word format, using Times New Roman font size 12, with single spacing and 2.5 cm margins on all sides. Pages and lines must be numbered to facilitate the review process.

General Considerations

All article types must meet the standards of scientific quality, originality, methodological rigor, and thematic relevance established by the journal. They must also demonstrate their contribution to the strengthening of agricultural extension, agrarian innovation, and the sustainable development of agri-food systems.

 

Manuscript Submission Procedure

Authors interested in publishing in REDA must submit their manuscripts through the online editorial management system (OJS). During this process, it will be necessary to complete the required metadata and upload the corresponding documentation, ensuring the consistency and accuracy of the information provided.

Required Documentation

Cover Letter

The manuscript must be accompanied by a cover letter addressed to the editorial team, including:

•          An explicit declaration that the manuscript is original, unpublished, and has not been simultaneously submitted to another journal.
•          A brief justification of the study's relevance and its contribution to the field of extension and agricultural development.
•          Confirmation that all authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author Contribution Declaration

A detailed description of each author's specific contribution must be included, in accordance with the CRediT taxonomy. Authorship is limited to those who have made substantial contributions to the design, execution, analysis, or writing of the study.

The declaration must clearly specify the functions performed by each author, using action verbs (e.g., conceptualized, designed the methodology, collected data, analyzed information, wrote the manuscript, critically reviewed the content). This information guarantees transparency and proper attribution of responsibilities.

Ethics Declaration

Authors must indicate whether the research received approval from an institutional ethics committee, where applicable, including the name of the evaluating entity and the protocol number. If the study does not involve human subjects, animals, or aspects requiring ethical evaluation, this condition must be expressly declared. In research conducted in rural contexts or with communities, respect for ethical principles must be guaranteed, including informed consent where applicable.

Funding

Funding sources that supported the research must be explicitly declared. If no funding was received, authors must clearly indicate this.

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

All authors must disclose any financial or non-financial relationship that could influence the results or interpretation of the study. This includes, among others, funding, consultancies, intellectual property, institutional affiliations, or relevant personal relationships. In the absence of conflicts of interest, an explicit declaration stating this condition must be included.